0 Prerequisites
0.1 Spectral Sequences
Spectral Sequences
Let \(\mathcal{C}\) be an abelian category. The nested subspace data (or SS data) for a spectral sequence at a single grading index consists of:
An ambient object \(V \in \mathcal{C}\).
A decreasing family of subobjects \(\{ Z_r\} _{r \in \mathbb {N} \cup \{ \infty \} }\) of \(V\), called \(r\)-cycles:
\[ V = Z_0 \supseteq Z_1 \supseteq Z_2 \supseteq \cdots \supseteq Z_\infty . \]An increasing family of subobjects \(\{ B_r\} _{r \in \mathbb {N} \cup \{ \infty \} }\) of \(V\), called \(r\)-boundaries:
\[ B_0 \subseteq B_1 \subseteq B_2 \subseteq \cdots \subseteq B_\infty . \]The containment \(B_r \subseteq Z_r\) for all \(r\).
\(Z_\infty \) is the greatest lower bound of the finite cycles: for any subobject \(X \subseteq V\), if \(X \subseteq Z_i\) for all \(i \in \mathbb {N}\), then \(X \subseteq Z_\infty \). Together with the monotonicity of \(Z\), this gives \(Z_\infty = \bigcap _{i \in \mathbb {N}} Z_i\).
\(B_\infty \) is the least upper bound of the finite boundaries: for any subobject \(X \subseteq V\), if \(B_i \subseteq X\) for all \(i \in \mathbb {N}\), then \(B_\infty \subseteq X\). Together with the monotonicity of \(B\), this gives \(B_\infty = \bigcup _{i \in \mathbb {N}} B_i\).
Together these form the nested chain
The \(r\)-th page at this index is defined as \(E_r = Z_r / B_r\). The \(E_\infty \)-page is \(E_\infty = Z_\infty / B_\infty \).
A spectral sequence in an abelian category \(\mathcal{C}\) with index type \(\iota \) (typically \(\mathbb {Z}^n\)) consists of:
A starting page index \(r_0 \in \mathbb {Z}\).
For each \(r \ge r_0\) and index \(\mathbf{k} \in \iota \), an object \(E_r^{\mathbf{k}} \in \mathcal{C}\) (the \(E_r\)-page at index \(\mathbf{k}\)).
A differential degree function \(\mathbf{d}: \mathbb {Z} \to \iota \), and differentials
\[ d_r^{\mathbf{k}}: E_r^{\mathbf{k}} \to E_r^{\mathbf{k} + \mathbf{d}(r)} \]satisfying \(d_r \circ d_r = 0\) componentwise.
For each index \(\mathbf{k}\), nested subspace data \((V^{\mathbf{k}}, Z_r^{\mathbf{k}}, B_r^{\mathbf{k}})\) such that \(E_r^{\mathbf{k}} = Z_r^{\mathbf{k}} / B_r^{\mathbf{k}}\) for \(r \ge r_0\).
An isomorphism \(H(E_r, d_r) \cong E_{r+1}\) for each \(r\). By the nesting \(B_r \subseteq B_{r+1} \subseteq Z_{r+1} \subseteq Z_r\), the differential \(d_r\) has kernel \(Z_{r+1}/B_r\) and image \(B_{r+1}/B_r\), so
\[ H(E_r, d_r) = \frac{Z_{r+1}/B_r}{B_{r+1}/B_r} \cong Z_{r+1}/B_{r+1} = E_{r+1} \]by the third isomorphism theorem.
All filtrations considered in this project are decreasing.
The \(E_\infty \)-page of a spectral sequence \(E\) at index \(\mathbf{k}\) is given by the nested subspace data: \(E_\infty ^{\mathbf{k}} = Z_\infty ^{\mathbf{k}} / B_\infty ^{\mathbf{k}}\). For bounded or degenerate spectral sequences, \(E_\infty = E_r\) for all sufficiently large \(r\).
A morphism of spectral sequences \(f: E \to E'\) consists of a family of maps \(\varphi _{\mathbf{k}}: V^{\mathbf{k}} \to V'^{\mathbf{k}}\) on the underlying objects at each index, preserving the cycle and boundary subobjects:
for all \(r\), and commuting with differentials on the induced page maps. A morphism induces maps on all pages \(E_r \to E'_r\) and on the \(E_\infty \)-page.
Convergence of Spectral Sequences
Let \(E\) be a spectral sequence with \(n\)-grading and let \(A\) be an \((n-1)\)-graded object equipped with a decreasing filtration (Definition 0.14). We say \(E\) converges to \(A\), written \(E_{r_0} \Longrightarrow A\), if there exists an isomorphism of \(n\)-graded objects
where the \(n\)-grading on \(\mathrm{gr}\, A\) is obtained from the \((n-1)\)-grading of \(A\) together with the filtration index, possibly composed with a fixed reindexing map.
This is convergence in the weak sense: we only require an isomorphism between \(E_\infty \) and \(\mathrm{gr}\, A\). Conditional convergence and strong convergence (in the sense of Boardman [ ) are not considered in this project.
Given a reindexing rule, the category of converging spectral sequences has objects \((E, A, F, \varphi )\) where \(E\) is a spectral sequence, \(A\) is a filtered graded object, and \(\varphi : E_\infty \xrightarrow {\sim } \mathrm{gr}\, A\) is the convergence isomorphism. A morphism \((E_1, A_1) \to (E_2, A_2)\) consists of:
A morphism of spectral sequences \(E_1 \to E_2\) (Definition 0.5), inducing maps on \(E_\infty \)-pages.
A filtration-preserving map \(A_1 \to A_2\).
Compatibility: the induced \(E_\infty \)-map and the associated graded map commute with the convergence isomorphisms.
In the setting of Definition 0.6, the component of the \(n\)-grading on \(E\) that corresponds to the original \((n-1)\)-grading of \(A\) is called the stem (or topological degree).
The component of the \(n\)-grading on \(E\) that corresponds to the filtration on \(A\) is called the filtration degree.
Suppose \(E\) converges to \(A\). Let \(x \in A\) be an element with filtration at least \(r\), i.e., \(x \in F^r A\). Let \(\bar{x}\) denote the image of \(x\) in \(\mathrm{gr}^r A = F^r A / F^{r+1} A\), and let \(y \in E_\infty \) be the element corresponding to \(\bar{x}\) under the convergence isomorphism. We say \(y\) detects \(x\).
An element \(x \in F^r A\) is detected by \(0 \in E_\infty \) if and only if \(x \in F^{r+1} A\).
Immediate from the definition of detection and the convergence isomorphism.
Two elements \(x, x' \in F^r A\) are both detected by the same \(y \in E_\infty \) if and only if \(x - x' \in F^{r+1} A\).
Follows from Proposition 0.12 applied to \(x - x'\).
Filtered Complex
A filtered \(n\)-graded abelian group is an \(n\)-graded abelian group \(A\) equipped with a decreasing filtration: for each index \(\mathbf{k} \in \mathbb {Z}^n\), a family of subgroups
A morphism of filtered graded abelian groups is a graded homomorphism \(f: A \to B\) that preserves the filtration: \(f(F^s A^{\mathbf{k}}) \subseteq F^s B^{\mathbf{k}}\) for all \(s\) and \(\mathbf{k}\). Filtered graded abelian groups and their morphisms form a category.
A filtered chain complex is a chain complex \((C_*, d)\) in the category of filtered graded abelian groups: the differential \(d: C_n \to C_{n-1}\) preserves the filtration, i.e., \(d(F^s C_n) \subseteq F^s C_{n-1}\) for all \(s\) and \(n\).
A filtered chain complex \((C_*, d, F^s)\) induces a natural filtration on its homology:
Given a filtered graded abelian group \((A, F)\), the associated graded is
Given a filtered chain complex \((C_*, d, F^s)\), the associated graded complex is the bigraded object \(\mathrm{gr}^s C_n\) equipped with the induced differential \(\bar{d}: \mathrm{gr}^s C_n \to \mathrm{gr}^s C_{n-1}\) (well-defined since \(d\) preserves the filtration).
A filtered chain complex \((C_*, d, F^s)\) is exhaustive if \(\bigcup _s F^s C_n = C_n\) for all \(n\).
A filtered chain complex \((C_*, d, F^s)\) is Hausdorff (or separated) if \(\bigcap _s F^s C_n = 0\) for all \(n\).
A filtered chain complex \((C_*, d, F^s)\) is bounded if for each \(n\), there exist \(a \le b\) with \(F^a C_n = C_n\) and \(F^{b+1} C_n = 0\). A bounded filtration is both exhaustive and Hausdorff.
Given a filtered chain complex \((C_*, d, F^s)\), we construct an SSData structure. The spectral sequence starts at \(E_0\) with \((n+1)\)-grading.
Define \(V^{s,t} = \mathrm{gr}^s C_{s+t}\), the associated graded.
Define \(Z_r^{s,t}\) as the image in \(\mathrm{gr}^s C_{s+t}\) of those \(x \in F^s C_{s+t}\) with \(dx \in F^{s+r} C_{s+t-1}\).
Define \(B_r^{s,t}\) as the image in \(\mathrm{gr}^s C_{s+t}\) of those elements of the form \(dy\) with \(y \in F^{s-r} C_{s+t+1}\).
The differential \(d_r: E_r^{s,t} \to E_r^{s+r,t-r+1}\) is induced by \(d\): for \([x] \in Z_r^{s,t}\), define \(d_r[x] = [dx] \in E_r^{s+r,t-r+1}\).
The differential \(d_r\) in Definition 0.23 is well-defined and satisfies \(d_r \circ d_r = 0\).
This is verified by a direct computation in the filtered complex, showing that the composition of two successive page differentials factors through zero.
The nested subspace data and differentials from Definition 0.23 satisfy the axioms of a spectral sequence. Specifically:
\(B_r \subseteq B_{r+1} \subseteq Z_{r+1} \subseteq Z_r\) for all \(r\).
\(E_r^{s,t} = Z_r^{s,t} / B_r^{s,t}\).
\(H(E_r, d_r) \cong E_{r+1}\).
The spectral sequence starts at \(E_0^{s,t} = F^s C_{s+t} / F^{s+1} C_{s+t}\) with differentials \(d_r: E_r^{s,t} \to E_r^{s+r,t-r+1}\).
If the filtration on a filtered chain complex is exhaustive and Hausdorff, then the associated spectral sequence converges to the homology:
The convergence isomorphism is \(E_\infty ^{s,t} \cong \mathrm{gr}^s H_{s+t}(C_*)\) with respect to the induced filtration from Proposition 0.17.
A morphism of filtered chain complexes \(f: (C_*, F) \to (D_*, G)\) is a chain map \(f: C_* \to D_*\) preserving the filtration: \(f(F^s C_n) \subseteq G^s D_n\) for all \(s, n\).
A morphism of filtered chain complexes induces a morphism of the associated spectral sequences. This construction is functorial.
Crossing of Differentials
Let \(E\) be a spectral sequence. A differential \(d_r(x) = y\) is called essential if \(y \ne 0\) on the \(E_r\)-page. Equivalently, \(d_r(x) = y\) is essential if \(x\) is not a boundary and \(y\) is not zero in \(E_r\). A differential is inessential if \(y = 0\) on the \(E_r\)-page.
A differential datum in a spectral sequence \(E\) is a triple \((r, x, y)\) where \(r \ge r_0\), \(x \in E_r^{\mathbf{k}}\), and \(y \in E_r^{\mathbf{k}+\mathbf{d}(r)}\) with \(d_r(x) = y\). We say the differential datum is essential if \(y \ne 0\), and denote it \(d_r(x) = y\).
Let \(f: V_1 \to V_2\) be a morphism of converging spectral sequences, and suppose \(d_n^f(x) = y\) is an \(f\)-extension differential with \(x \in E_\infty ^{s}(V_1)\) and \(y \in E_\infty ^{s+n}(V_2)\).
We say that \(d_n^f(x) = y\) has a crossing that hits filtration \(p\) for some \(p \le s+n\), if there exists \(x' \in E_\infty ^{s+a}(V_1)\) with \(a {\gt} 0\) and an essential differential \(d_{n-a}^f(x') = y'\) for \(0 \ne y' \in E_\infty ^{s+a+(n-a)}(V_2)\) such that
\[ p \le \mathrm{Fil}(y') \le \mathrm{Fil}(y) = s + n. \]We say that \(d_n^f(x) = y\) has no crossing that hits the range \(\mathrm{Fil} \ge p\) if there does not exist such \(x'\) and \(y'\) with \(p \le \mathrm{Fil}(y') \le \mathrm{Fil}(y)\).
We say that \(d_n^f(x) = y\) has no crossing if it has no crossing that hits the range \(\mathrm{Fil} \ge \mathrm{Fil}(x) + 1 = s + 1\).
The following are equivalent:
An \(f\)-extension \(d_n^f(x) = y\) has no crossing that hits the range \(\mathrm{Fil} \ge p\).
For any \(a {\gt} 0\), if there is an \(f\)-extension from \(x' \in E_\infty ^{s+a}(V_1)\) to some nontrivial \(y'\), then \(\mathrm{Fil}(y') {\lt} p\) or \(\mathrm{Fil}(y') {\gt} \mathrm{Fil}(y)\).
An \(f\)-extension from \(x\) to \(y\) has no crossing in the range \(\mathrm{Fil} \ge p\) if and only if for all \([x] \in \{ x\} \) such that \(\mathrm{Fil}(f_A[x]) \ge p\) we have \(f_A[x] \in \{ y\} \). In particular:
An \(f\)-extension from \(x\) to \(y\) has no crossing if and only if for all \([x] \in \{ x\} \) we have \(f_A[x] \in \{ y\} \).
An \(f\)-extension \(d_n^f(x) = 0\) has no crossing if and only if for all \([x] \in \{ x\} \), \(\mathrm{Fil}(f_A[x]) {\gt} \mathrm{Fil}(x) + n\).
If \(\mathrm{AF}(f) = n\), then all \(d_n^f\)-differentials have no crossing.
Only if. Suppose the extension has no crossing in \(\mathrm{Fil} \ge p\). Assume for contradiction that there exists \([x] \in \{ x\} \) with \(\mathrm{Fil}(f_A[x]) \ge p\) but \(f_A[x] \notin \{ y\} \). Let \(y'\) be the element of \(E_\infty (V_2)\) detecting \(f_A[x]\), so \(f_A[x] \in \{ y'\} \) with \(\mathrm{Fil}(y') \ge p\). By Proposition 0.41 there is an \(f\)-extension from \(x\) to \(y'\). By Proposition 0.42 (2), \(y'\) (if \(\mathrm{Fil}(y) {\gt} \mathrm{Fil}(y')\)) or \(y - y'\) (if \(\mathrm{Fil}(y) = \mathrm{Fil}(y')\)) is hit by a shorter \(d^f\)-differential from some \(x'\) with \(\mathrm{Fil}(x') {\gt} \mathrm{Fil}(x)\). This gives a crossing that hits \(\mathrm{Fil} \ge p\), contradicting the assumption.
If. Suppose the extension has a crossing: there exist \(x' \in E_\infty ^{s+a}(V_1)\) with \(a {\gt} 0\) and essential \(d_{n-a}^f(x') = y'\) with \(p \le \mathrm{Fil}(y') \le \mathrm{Fil}(y)\). By Proposition 0.41, there exists \([x'] \in \{ x'\} \) with \(f_A([x']) \in \{ y'\} \). Since \(\mathrm{Fil}(x') {\gt} \mathrm{Fil}(x)\), the element \([x] + [x'] \in \{ x\} \) (as \([x']\) lies in higher filtration). Then
and this element is detected by \(y'\) (if \(\mathrm{Fil}(y') {\lt} \mathrm{Fil}(y)\)) or by \(y + y'\) (if \(\mathrm{Fil}(y') = \mathrm{Fil}(y)\)). In either case \(f_A([x] + [x']) \notin \{ y\} \) while \(\mathrm{Fil}(f_A([x] + [x'])) \ge p\), contradicting the assumption.
Parts (1) and (2) are special cases. Part (3) holds for degree reasons: if \(\mathrm{AF}(f) = n\), then \(f_A\) raises filtration by at least \(n\), so \(\mathrm{Fil}(f_A[x]) \ge s + n\) for all \([x] \in F^s A_1\).
Extension Spectral Sequence
Let \(f: V_1 \to V_2\) be a morphism of converging spectral sequences, with underlying map \(f_A: A_1 \to A_2\) on the target groups. The underlying filtered chain complex of \(f\) is the two-term chain complex
equipped with the filtrations on \(A_1\) and \(A_2\) inherited from the convergence data: \(F^s C_1 = F^s A_1\) and \(F^s C_0 = F^s A_2\). Since \(f_A\) preserves the filtration, this is a filtered chain complex in the sense of Definition 0.16.
The \(f\)-extension spectral sequence (\(f\)-ESS) is the spectral sequence
obtained by applying the filtered complex construction (Theorem 0.25) to the underlying filtered chain complex of Definition 0.34. By Theorem 0.26, if the filtrations on \(A_1\) and \(A_2\) are exhaustive and Hausdorff (which holds when they are bounded), then the \(f\)-ESS converges to the homology of the underlying complex, i.e., to \(\ker (f_A) \oplus \mathrm{coker}(f_A)\).
The \(E_0\)-page of the \(f\)-ESS is canonically isomorphic to the direct sum of the \(E_\infty \)-pages of the source and target:
This follows from \(E_0^s = \mathrm{gr}^s C_* = \mathrm{gr}^s A_1 \oplus \mathrm{gr}^s A_2 \cong E_\infty ^s(V_1) \oplus E_\infty ^s(V_2)\).
Under the decomposition \(\mathrm{ESS}(f)_0^{s} \cong E_\infty ^{s}(V_1) \oplus E_\infty ^{s}(V_2)\), the differentials of the \(f\)-ESS have the form
and only the component \(E_\infty ^{s}(V_1) \to E_\infty ^{s+n}(V_2)\) can be nonzero; the other three components (source-to-source, target-to-source, target-to-target) vanish. This follows from the chain complex structure: the differential of \(C_*\) maps \(C_1 = A_1\) to \(C_0 = A_2\) and is zero in the reverse direction.
The \(f\)-extension differential \(d_n^f: E_\infty ^{s}(V_1) \to E_\infty ^{s+n}(V_2)\) is the unique nonzero component of the \(n\)-th differential of the \(f\)-ESS (Proposition 0.37). We say there is an \(f\)-extension from \(x \in E_\infty ^{s}(V_1)\) to \(y \in E_\infty ^{s+n}(V_2)\) if \(d_n^f(x) = y\). The extension is essential if \(y\) is nontrivial on the \(E_n\)-page; otherwise it is inessential.
The zeroth extension differential \(d_0^f\) equals the map induced by \(f\) on the associated graded:
Under the identification \(\mathrm{gr}^s A_i \cong E_\infty ^s(V_i)\), this is the map \(E_\infty ^s(V_1) \to E_\infty ^s(V_2)\) induced by \(f\) on \(E_\infty \)-pages.
This is the standard formula for the \(E_0\)-differential of a filtered complex (Definition 0.23): \(d_0\) is induced by the chain differential on the associated graded.
For \(x \in E_\infty ^{s}(V_1)\), let \(\{ x\} \subseteq A_1\) denote the set of elements detected by \(x\):
For \([x] \in \{ x\} \), we call \([x]\) a representative of \(x\). Note that \(\{ x\} \) is a coset of \(F^{s+1}A_1\) in \(F^s A_1\).
An \(f\)-extension \(d_n^f(x) = y\) holds if and only if there exists \([x] \in \{ x\} \) such that \(f_A[x] \in \{ y\} \).
Follows directly from the filtered complex construction: \(d_n^f(x) = y\) means there is a lift of \(x\) in \(F^s A_1\) whose image under \(f_A\) lies in \(F^{s+n} A_2\) and represents \(y\) in \(\mathrm{gr}^{s+n} A_2\).
Consider \(f: V_1 \to V_2\), \(x \in E_\infty ^{s}(V_1)\), \(y \in E_\infty ^{s+n}(V_2)\) and \(y' \in E_\infty ^{s+m}(V_2)\) for \(m, n \ge 0\).
An \(f\)-extension from \(x\) to \(y\) is inessential, i.e., \(y\) is trivial on the \(E_n\)-page of the \(f\)-ESS, if and only if there exists \(x' \in E_\infty ^{s+a}(V_1)\) for some \(0 {\lt} a \le n\) with an essential differential \(d_{n-a}^f(x') = y\). Equivalently, there exists \([x'] \in \{ x'\} \subseteq A_1\) with \(\mathrm{Fil}(x') {\gt} \mathrm{Fil}(x)\) such that \(f_A[x'] \in \{ y\} \).
Suppose \(d_n^f(x) = y\) and \(d_m^f(x) = y'\).
If \(m = n\), then \(y - y' \in {}^f\! B_{n-1}^{s+n}(V_2)\): there exists \(x' \in E_\infty ^{s+a}(V_1)\) for some \(0 {\lt} a \le n\) with an essential differential \(d_{n-a}^f(x') = y - y'\).
If \(m {\gt} n\), then the \(f\)-extension from \(x\) to \(y\) is inessential.
Part (1) follows from the definition of the page boundaries in the filtered complex construction. Parts (2a) and (2b) follow from Part (1) and Proposition 0.41.
Suppose the sequence of converging spectral sequences \(V_1 \xrightarrow {f} V_2 \xrightarrow {g} V_3\) induces an exact sequence on target groups \(A_1 \xrightarrow {f_A} A_2 \xrightarrow {g_A} A_3\) that is exact at \(A_2\). Then all permanent \(d^g\)-cycles in \(E_\infty (V_2)\) are boundaries in the \(f\)-ESS.
First proof (via chain complexes). Treat the three-term sequence \(A_1 \xrightarrow {f_A} A_2 \xrightarrow {g_A} A_3\) as a filtered chain complex. Its associated spectral sequence comprises both the \(d^f\) and \(d^g\) differentials. By exactness at \(A_2\), the abutment projected to the \(A_2\)-component is zero. Therefore every permanent \(d^g\)-cycle must be killed by a \(d^f\)-differential.
Second proof (via representatives). Let \(y \in E_\infty (V_2)\) be a permanent \(d^g\)-cycle. By convergence, there exists \([y] \in \{ y\} \) with \(g_A([y]) = 0\). By exactness, there exists \([x] \in A_1\) with \(f_A([x]) = [y]\). Let \(x \in E_\infty (V_1)\) detect \([x]\). Then \(f_A[x] \in \{ y\} \), so by Proposition 0.41 there is an \(f\)-extension from \(x\) to \(y\).
Unbounded Extension Spectral Sequence.
Throughout this subsection, all filtrations are assumed to be bounded below: the filtration \(F^\bullet A\) satisfies \(F^p A = A\) for all sufficiently negative \(p\). Filtrations need not be bounded above. We extend the \(f\)-ESS construction to this setting by defining it as the inverse limit of bounded truncations.
Let \((E, A, F)\) be a converging spectral sequence with filtration \(F^\bullet A\) bounded below. For an integer \(s\), the \(s\)-truncation of \((E, A, F)\) is the converging spectral sequence \((E^{[\le s]}, A^{[\le s]}, F^{[\le s]})\) defined as follows:
The truncated spectral sequence: for each filtration degree \(p\), set
\[ V^{[\le s],p} = \begin{cases} V^p & \text{if } p \le s, \\ 0 & \text{otherwise,} \end{cases} \]so that \(E_r^{[\le s],p} = E_r^p\) for \(p \le s\) and \(E_r^{[\le s],p} = 0\) for \(p {\gt} s\).
The truncated abutment is the quotient
\[ A^{[\le s]} = A \big/ F^{s+1} A, \]equipped with the induced filtration
\[ F^{[\le s],p} A^{[\le s]} = \begin{cases} \big(F^p A + F^{s+1} A\big) \big/ F^{s+1} A & \text{if } p \le s, \\ 0 & \text{if } p {\gt} s. \end{cases} \]When \(F^p A = A\) (which holds for all sufficiently negative \(p\) by the bounded below assumption), this reduces to \(F^{[\le s],p} A^{[\le s]} = A^{[\le s]}\).
The truncation \((E^{[\le s]}, A^{[\le s]}, F^{[\le s]})\) is a converging spectral sequence with bounded (hence exhaustive and Hausdorff) filtration.
The collection \(\{ (E^{[\le s]}, A^{[\le s]})\} _{s \in {\mathbb Z}}\) forms an inverse system in the category of converging spectral sequences, indexed by \(s\) with order \(s \ge s'\). For \(s \ge s'\), the transition morphism is the natural projection
which is compatible with the truncated filtrations and with the spectral sequence page maps.
Let \((E, A, F)\) be a converging spectral sequence with filtration bounded below. Then the spectral sequence \(E\) is the inverse limit of the spectral sequences of the truncations: at each filtration degree \(p\) and page \(r\) one has
Let \((E, A, F)\) be a converging spectral sequence with filtration bounded below. If the filtration on \(A\) is complete (Definition 0.50), then the converging spectral sequence \((E, A)\) is the inverse limit of the inverse system of truncations in the category of converging spectral sequences:
Let \(f: (E_1, A_1) \to (E_2, A_2)\) be a morphism of converging spectral sequences with filtrations bounded below (not necessarily bounded above). For each integer \(s\), let \(f^{[\le s]}: (E_1^{[\le s]}, A_1^{[\le s]}) \to (E_2^{[\le s]}, A_2^{[\le s]})\) denote the induced morphism of truncated converging spectral sequences. The unbounded \(f\)-extension spectral sequence is the spectral sequence (without converging data) defined as the inverse limit in the category of spectral sequences:
where each \(\mathrm{ESS}(f^{[\le s]})\) is the (bounded) extension spectral sequence of Definition 0.35. The inverse limit is well-defined as a spectral sequence by the stabilization property (Proposition 0.49).
Let \(f: (E_1, A_1) \to (E_2, A_2)\) be a morphism of converging spectral sequences with filtrations bounded below. Fix a filtration degree \(p \in {\mathbb Z}\) and a page index \(r \ge 1\). Then for all integers \(s \ge p + r\), the component of the \(s\)-truncated extension spectral sequence at filtration degree \(p\) and page \(r\) is canonically isomorphic to the corresponding component of the \(s'\)-truncated extension spectral sequence for any \(s' \ge s\):
In other words, once the truncation level \(s \ge p + r\) (so that the truncated ESS retains both the source filtration degree \(p\) and the target filtration degree \(p + r\)), the \(d_r^f\)-differential at filtration degree \(p\) is fully determined and independent of the truncation level.
Let \((E, A, F)\) be a converging spectral sequence with filtration bounded below. The completion of \(A\) with respect to the filtration \(F\) is the inverse limit
There is a natural map \(\iota : A \to \widehat{A}\) induced by the projections \(A \to A/F^{s+1}A\). The filtration is called complete if \(\iota \) is an isomorphism. The Hausdorff condition (Definition 0.21) ensures \(\iota \) is injective; completeness further requires \(\iota \) to be surjective.
Let \(f: (E_1, A_1) \to (E_2, A_2)\) be a morphism of converging spectral sequences with filtrations bounded below. Suppose that the inverse systems \(\{ A_i^{[\le s]}\} _{s \in {\mathbb Z}}\) (for \(i = 1, 2\)) satisfy the Mittag-Leffler condition: for each \(s\), the images of the transition maps \(A_i^{[\le s']} \to A_i^{[\le s]}\) stabilize as \(s' \to \infty \). Then the unbounded \(f\)-extension spectral sequence \(\mathrm{ESS}^{\mathrm{unbd}}(f)\) converges to the bigraded associated-graded homology of the completions:
where \(\hat{f}_A: \widehat{A}_1 \to \widehat{A}_2\) is the completion of \(f_A\), and the right-hand side denotes the bigraded associated-graded homology of the two-term complex equipped with the filtrations induced on \(\widehat{A}_1\) and \(\widehat{A}_2\).
Commutativity of Extension Differentials
Consider a homotopy commutative diagram of converging spectral sequences
Suppose \(m, n, l \ge 0\), \(0 {\lt} k \le m + l - n\),
and
\(d_n^f(x) = y\),
\(d_m^p(x) = z\),
the differential in (1) or (2) has no crossing,
\(d_l^g(z) = w\), and has no crossing that hits \(\mathrm{Fil} \ge s + n + k\),
\(d_{k-1}^q y = 0\), and has no crossing.
Then \(d_{m+l-n}^q(y) = w\).
First we find a representative \([x] \in \{ x\} \) such that \(p_A[x] \in \{ z\} \) and \(f_A[x] \in \{ y\} \).
If the differential in (2) has no crossing, by Proposition 0.33 we can pick \([x] \in \{ x\} \) such that \(p_A[x] \in \{ z\} \); by Proposition 0.41, \(f_A[x] \in \{ y'\} \) for some \(y'\), but the no-crossing condition forces \(f_A[x] \in \{ y\} \). Symmetrically, if the differential in (1) has no crossing, we pick \([x]\) with \(f_A[x] \in \{ y\} \) and the no-crossing forces \(p_A[x] \in \{ z\} \).
By (5) and Proposition 0.33 (2), since \(d_{k-1}^q y = 0\) has no crossing, \(\mathrm{Fil}(q_A f_A[x]) \ge s + n + k\). Since the diagram commutes on target groups, \(g_A p_A[x] = q_A f_A[x]\), so \(\mathrm{Fil}(g_A p_A[x]) \ge s + n + k\).
Combining with (4) (\(d_l^g(z) = w\) has no crossing that hits \(\mathrm{Fil} \ge s + n + k\)) and \(p_A[x] \in \{ z\} \), Proposition 0.33 gives \(g_A p_A[x] \in \{ w\} \).
Therefore \(q_A f_A[x] \in \{ w\} \), and since \(f_A[x] \in \{ y\} \), there is a \(q\)-extension from \(y\) to \(w\) by Proposition 0.41.
In the setting of Theorem 0.52, if condition (4) is strengthened to “\(d_l^g(z) = w\) has no crossing” (and condition (5) is dropped), then \(d_{m+l-n}^q(y) = w\).
If \(d_l^g(z) = w\) has no crossing, then in particular it has no crossing that hits \(\mathrm{Fil} \ge s + n + k\) for any \(k\). Taking \(k = 1\) and observing that \(d_0^q y = 0\) trivially has no crossing, the result follows from Theorem 0.52.
Consider a homotopy commutative diagram of converging spectral sequences \(V_1 \xrightarrow {f} V_2 \xrightarrow {q} V_3\) with \(p = q \circ f\). If \(d_n^f(x) = y\), \(d_m^p(x) = z\), and one of the two extensions has no crossing, then \(d_{m-n}^q(y) = z\).
This is the special case of Corollary 0.53 with \(V_3 = V_4\) and \(g = \mathrm{id}_{V_3}\): since \(d_0^g(z) = z\) and the identity extension always has no crossing, the conditions are satisfied with \(l = 0\).
Consider a homotopy commutative diagram of converging spectral sequences \(V_1 \xrightarrow {p} V_3 \xrightarrow {g} V_4\) with \(q = g \circ p\). If \(d_m^p(x) = z\) and \(d_l^g(z) = w\) has no crossing, then \(d_{m+l}^q(x) = w\).
This is the special case of Corollary 0.53 with \(V_1 = V_2\) and \(f = \mathrm{id}_{V_1}\): since \(d_0^f(x) = x\) with \(n = 0\) and the identity extension has no crossing, the conditions give \(d_{m+l-0}^q(y) = d_{m+l}^q(x) = w\).
If \(g \circ f = 0\) (as morphisms of converging spectral sequences) and \(d_n^f(x) = y\), then \(y\) is a permanent cycle in the \(g\)-ESS: \(d_m^g(y) = 0\) for all \(m \ge 0\).
Consider the commutative diagram
with \(p = 0\) and \(g \circ f = 0\). All extensions from \(x\) to \(0\) are trivial and have no crossing. By Corollary 0.53, \(d_m^g(y) = 0\).
Alternative proof. By Proposition 0.41, there exists \([x] \in \{ x\} \) with \(f_A[x] \in \{ y\} \). Let \([y] = f_A[x]\). Then \(g_A([y]) = g_A(f_A([x])) = 0\). Hence \(y\) is a permanent \(d^g\)-cycle.
Consider a homotopy commutative diagram of converging spectral sequences
Assume \({}^{p}\! E_0 = {}^{p}\! E_r\) and \({}^{q}\! E_0 = {}^{q}\! E_r\) for some \(r \ge 0\) (i.e., the \(p\)-ESS and \(q\)-ESS have stationary pages up to \(r\)). Then \((d_r^p, d_r^q)\) induces a map from the \(f\)-ESS to the \(g\)-ESS.
Since \({}^{p}\! E_0 = {}^{p}\! E_r\) and \({}^{q}\! E_0 = {}^{q}\! E_r\), the differentials \(d_r^p\) and \(d_r^q\) have no crossings. By Corollary 0.53, \(d_0^g \circ d_r^p = d_r^q \circ d_0^f\) and therefore \((d_r^p, d_r^q)\) induces a map from \({}^{f}\! E_1\) to \({}^{g}\! E_1\). Inductively, applying Corollary 0.53 shows that \((d_r^p, d_r^q)\) induces a map from \({}^{f}\! E_n\) to \({}^{g}\! E_n\) and \(d_n^g \circ d_r^p = d_r^q \circ d_n^f\) for all \(n\).
0.2 Stable Homotopy Theory
Stable Homotopy Theory
A triangulated category is an additive category \(\mathcal{T}\) equipped with:
An additive autoequivalence \(\Sigma : \mathcal{T} \to \mathcal{T}\), called the shift (or suspension) functor.
A class of distinguished triangles \(X \to Y \to Z \to \Sigma X\), satisfying the axioms (TR1)–(TR4):
Every morphism \(f: X \to Y\) extends to a distinguished triangle \(X \xrightarrow {f} Y \to Z \to \Sigma X\). The triangle \(X \xrightarrow {\mathrm{id}} X \to 0 \to \Sigma X\) is distinguished.
A triangle \(X \to Y \to Z \to \Sigma X\) is distinguished if and only if \(Y \to Z \to \Sigma X \to \Sigma Y\) is distinguished.
Given a morphism of the first two terms of two distinguished triangles, there exists a (not necessarily unique) morphism of the third terms making the diagram commute.
The octahedral axiom.
In a triangulated category, a distinguished triangle \(X \xrightarrow {f} Y \to C_f \to \Sigma X\) is called a cofiber sequence, and \(C_f\) is the cofiber (or cone) of \(f\). By (TR1), every morphism admits a cofiber sequence.
A functorial cofiber on a triangulated category \(\mathcal{T}\) is an assignment that to each morphism \(f: X \to Y\) in \(\mathcal{T}\) associates a distinguished triangle \(X \xrightarrow {f} Y \to Cf \to \Sigma X\) that is functorial: given a commutative square
there is an induced map \(C\alpha \beta : Cf \to Cf'\) making the diagram of distinguished triangles commute.
For a distinguished triangle \(X \to Y \to Z \to \Sigma X\) and any object \(W\), the long exact sequence on hom-sets
holds (covariant), and dually for the contravariant case.
A closed symmetric monoidal category is a category \(\mathcal{C}\) equipped with:
A unit object \(S\).
A bifunctor \((X, Y) \mapsto X \wedge Y\) (the smash product or tensor product) from \(\mathcal{C} \times \mathcal{C}\) to \(\mathcal{C}\), which is associative and commutative up to coherent natural isomorphism, with \(S \wedge X \cong X\) up to coherent natural isomorphism.
Function objects \(F(X, Y)\), functorial contravariantly in \(X\) and covariantly in \(Y\), satisfying the tensor-hom adjunction
\[ [X, F(Y, Z)] \cong [X \wedge Y, Z] \]naturally in all three variables.
A closed symmetric tensor triangulated category is a triangulated category \(\mathcal{C}\) equipped with a closed symmetric monoidal structure (Definition 0.62) that is compatible with the triangulation:
The smash product preserves suspensions: there is a natural equivalence \(e_{X,Y}: \Sigma X \wedge Y \xrightarrow {\sim } \Sigma (X \wedge Y)\), compatible with the unit and associativity isomorphisms.
The smash product is exact: if \(X \xrightarrow {f} Y \xrightarrow {g} Z \xrightarrow {h} \Sigma X\) is an exact triangle, then for any object \(W\),
\[ X \wedge W \xrightarrow {f \wedge 1} Y \wedge W \xrightarrow {g \wedge 1} Z \wedge W \xrightarrow {h \wedge 1} \Sigma (X \wedge W) \]is exact.
The functor \(F(X, Y)\) is exact in \(Y\); it is exact in \(X\) up to sign.
The smash product interacts with suspension in a graded-commutative manner: the twist map \(T: S^r \wedge S^s \to S^s \wedge S^r\) and the equivalence \(S^r \wedge S^s \simeq S^{r+s}\) satisfy \(T = (-1)^{rs}\).
This definition follows Hovey–Palmieri–Strickland [ , Definition A.2.1.
A closed symmetric tensor triangulated category with functorial cofiber is a closed symmetric tensor triangulated category \(\mathcal{T}\) (Definition 0.63) equipped with:
A functorial cofiber (Definition 0.60).
A tensor-cofiber exchange: for any morphism \(f: X \to Y\) and any object \(W\), a natural isomorphism
\[ C(f \wedge W) \cong C(f) \wedge W, \]where \(f \wedge W : X \wedge W \to Y \wedge W\) denotes the right-tensoring of \(f\) with \(W\) (i.e., \(f \otimes \mathrm{id}_W\)), compatible with the triangulated structure.
The stable homotopy category \(\mathcal{S}\) is a closed symmetric tensor triangulated category with functorial cofiber (Definition 0.64). Its objects are called spectra.
In this project, \(\mathcal{S}\) refers to the homotopy category of spectra (in the sense of stable homotopy theory). It can be constructed as the homotopy category of a stable model category, but we take it as given and work axiomatically with its triangulated and closed symmetric monoidal structure.
Given morphisms \(f: X \to Y\) and \(g: X \to Z\) in \(\mathcal{S}\), the pushout of the diagram \(Y \xleftarrow {f} X \xrightarrow {g} Z\) is the cofiber \(C(f, g)\) of the canonical morphism \((f, g): X \to Y \vee Z\), where \(Y \vee Z\) denotes the coproduct (wedge sum) in \(\mathcal{S}\).
The sphere spectrum \(\mathbb {S} \in \mathcal{S}\) is the unit object for the smash product.
For an integer \(n \in \mathbb {Z}\), define
the \(n\)-fold suspension of the sphere spectrum.
For a spectrum \(X \in \mathcal{S}\), the \(n\)-th homotopy group of \(X\) is
For any spectrum \(X\), the collection \(\pi _* X = \{ \pi _n X\} _{n \in \mathbb {Z}}\) is a graded abelian group.
The smash product \(\wedge : \mathcal{S} \times \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{S}\) is the symmetric monoidal product from the closed symmetric monoidal structure of \(\mathcal{S}\) (Definition 0.63), with unit \(\mathbb {S}\). It satisfies \(S^m \wedge S^n \simeq S^{m+n}\) and induces a pairing on homotopy groups:
For spectra \(X, Y \in \mathcal{S}\), the mapping spectrum \(F(X, Y)\) is the internal hom (function object) from the closed symmetric monoidal structure (Definition 0.63), adjoint to the smash product:
In particular, \(\pi _n F(X, Y) \cong [\Sigma ^n X, Y]\).
Let \(X \xrightarrow {f} Y \to C_f \to \Sigma X\) be a cofiber sequence. Then there is a long exact sequence of homotopy groups:
This follows from Proposition 0.61 and the representability \(\pi _n(-) = [S^n, -]\).
Follows from the long exact Hom sequence applied to representable functors.
Cohomology
The Eilenberg–MacLane spectrum \(\mathrm{H}{\mathbb F}_2\) is the spectrum representing mod 2 ordinary cohomology. It is a commutative ring spectrum in \(\mathcal{S}\).
The homotopy groups of the Eilenberg–MacLane spectrum are
The mod 2 cohomology of a spectrum \(X\) is
The mod 2 homology of a spectrum \(X\) is
(Universal Coefficient Theorem) For any spectrum \(X\) and \(n \in {\mathbb Z}\), the mod 2 cohomology is canonically isomorphic to the \({\mathbb F}_2\)-linear dual of the mod 2 homology:
Adams Spectral Sequence
Construction.
The \(\mathrm{H}{\mathbb F}_2\)-Adams spectral sequence is a functor from \(\mathcal{S}^{op} \times \mathcal{S}\) to the category of bigraded spectral sequences. For spectra \(X\) and \(Y\), it produces a spectral sequence \(\{ E_r^{s,t}(X, Y), d_r\} \) with \(r \ge 2\) and differentials
A map \(f: X' \to X\) induces maps \(f^*: E_r^{s,t}(X, Y) \to E_r^{s,t}(X', Y)\), and a map \(g: Y \to Y'\) induces maps \(g_*: E_r^{s,t}(X, Y) \to E_r^{s,t}(X, Y')\), both compatible with differentials. When \(X = \mathbb {S}\), we write \(E_r^{s,t}(Y) = E_r^{s,t}(\mathbb {S}, Y)\).
All elements in the \(E_2\)-page of the mod 2 Adams spectral sequence have order 2, i.e., \(2x = 0\) for all \(x \in E_2^{s,t}(X)\). This holds because \(E_2^{s,t}(X)\) is an \({\mathbb F}_2\)-vector space.
The full subcategory \({\mathcal S}^{fin} \subset {\mathcal S}\) of finite spectra is the smallest full subcategory containing the sphere spectrum \({\mathbb S}\) and closed under suspension, desuspension, and taking cofibers.
\(Z \in {\mathcal S}^{fin}\) if and only if \(Z\) can be obtained from \({\mathbb S}\) by finitely many operations of the following two types:
suspension or desuspension,
taking the cofiber of a map from a sphere spectrum \(S^n\).
Connectivity.
A spectrum \(X\) is \(n\)-connected if \(\pi _i(X) = 0\) for all \(i \le n\).
The sphere spectrum \({\mathbb S}\) is \((-1)\)-connected.
A spectrum \(X\) is bounded below if it is \(n\)-connected for some \(n \in {\mathbb Z}\).
If \(X\) is \(n\)-connected, then \(H_i(X; {\mathbb F}_2) = 0\) for all \(i \le n\).
Finite type.
A spectrum \(X\) is of finite type if for each \(n\), there exists a finite spectrum \(X_n \in {\mathcal S}^{fin}\) and a map \(X_n \to X\) whose cofiber is \(n\)-connected.
A spectrum \(X\) is of finite type if and only if:
\(X\) is bounded below, and
for each \(i\), the homotopy group \(\pi _i(X)\) is finitely generated as an abelian group.
If \(X\) is of finite type, then \(H_i(X; {\mathbb F}_2)\) is a finite-dimensional \({\mathbb F}_2\)-vector space for each \(i\).
Convergence and boundedness.
In this paragraph, assume \(X \in {\mathcal S}^{fin}\) and \(Y\) is of finite type.
The Adams spectral sequence induces a natural decreasing filtration on \(\pi _* X\), called the Adams filtration. An element \(\alpha \in \pi _n X\) has Adams filtration \(\ge s\) if it lies in \(F^s \pi _n X\).
The Adams filtration extends to maps between spectra. For \(X \in {\mathcal S}^{fin}\) and \(Y\) of finite type, a map \(f \in [X, Y]\) has Adams filtration \(\mathrm{AF}(f) \ge k\) if \(f\) factors as a composition
where each \(f_i\) induces the zero map on mod 2 homology: \((f_i)_* = 0: H_*(X_{i-1}; {\mathbb F}_2) \to H_*(X_i; {\mathbb F}_2)\). The Adams filtration \(\mathrm{AF}(f)\) is the largest such \(k\).
A map \(f: X \to Y\) with \(\mathrm{AF}(f) = k\) maps \(F^s \pi _* X\) into \(F^{s+k} \pi _* Y\) for all \(s\).
If \(\mathrm{AF}(f) = k\), then \(d_i^f = 0\) for \(i {\lt} k\) in the \(f\)-extension spectral sequence.
By Proposition 0.41, \(d_i^f(x) = y\) requires \([x] \in \{ x\} \) with \(f_A[x] \in \{ y\} \), which forces \(\mathrm{Fil}(f_A[x]) \ge s + i\). But \(\mathrm{AF}(f) = k\) means \(f_A\) raises filtration by at least \(k\), so \(\mathrm{Fil}(f_A[x]) \ge s + k {\gt} s + i\) for \(i {\lt} k\), hence \(y = 0\).
A map \(f \in [X, Y]\) has Adams filtration \(\infty \) if \(\mathrm{AF}(f) \ge n\) for all \(n\).
If \(f\) has odd order in \([X,Y]\), then \(f\) has Adams filtration \(\infty \).
If \(f\) does not have odd order, then \(f\) does not have Adams filtration \(\infty \).
For \(X \in {\mathcal S}^{fin}\) and \(Y\) of finite type, the Adams spectral sequence \(Adams(X,Y)\) weakly converges to \([X, Y]\): there is a natural isomorphism between the graded pieces of the Adams filtration on \([X, Y]\) and the \(E_\infty \)-page of \(Adams(X,Y)\).
The quotient \([X, Y] / \{ \text{odd-order elements}\} \) carries an induced Adams filtration that is separated (Hausdorff).
Suppose \(X\) is of finite type. Then:
If additionally \(H_i(X; {\mathbb Q}) = 0\) for some \(i\), then the Adams filtration on \(\pi _i(X) / \{ \text{odd-order elements}\} \) is bounded.
All subquotients of the Adams filtration on \(\pi _i(X) / \{ \text{odd-order elements}\} \) are finite groups.
0.3 \(\mathrm{H}{\mathbb F}_2\)-Synthetic Spectra
Synthetic Spectra
The category \(h\mathrm{Syn}\) of \(\mathrm{H}{\mathbb F}_2\)-synthetic spectra is a closed symmetric monoidal triangulated category with functorial cofiber (it arises as the homotopy category of a stable model category \(\mathrm{Syn}_{\mathrm{H}{\mathbb F}_2}\)). We denote its tensor product by \(\otimes \) and its unit object by \(\mathbf{1}\).
The category \(h\mathrm{Syn}\) admits a bigraded suspension \(\Sigma ^{m,n}\) for each \((m,n) \in \mathbb {Z}^2\), which is an autoequivalence of \(h\mathrm{Syn}\) satisfying
The functor \(\Sigma ^{1,0}\) is identified with the triangulated suspension functor.
The bigraded suspension commutes with the tensor product: for all \((m,n) \in {\mathbb Z}^2\) and objects \(X, Y\) of \(h\mathrm{Syn}\),
There exists a natural transformation
in \(h\mathrm{Syn}\). For a synthetic spectrum \(X\), \(\lambda _X\) denotes the component \(\Sigma ^{0,-1}X \to X\).
For \(n \ge 0\), define \(\lambda ^n_X: \Sigma ^{0,-n}X \to X\) by induction:
\(\lambda ^0_X = \mathrm{id}_X: X \to X\).
\(\lambda ^{n+1}_X = \lambda _X \circ \Sigma ^{0,-1}(\lambda ^n_X): \Sigma ^{0,-n-1}X \to \Sigma ^{0,-1}X \to X\), using the composition isomorphism \(\Sigma ^{0,-n-1} \cong \Sigma ^{0,-1}\Sigma ^{0,-n}\).
We define \(X/\lambda ^n\) as the cofiber of \(\lambda ^n_X\). In particular, \(X/\lambda ^0 = 0\) and \(X/\lambda ^1 = X/\lambda \). The cofiber construction gives a distinguished triangle
The homotopy category \(h\mathrm{Syn}\) is enriched over \({\mathbb Z}[\lambda ]\)-modules.
The argument proceeds in three steps:
Since \(h\mathrm{Syn}\) is preadditive, it is enriched over \({\mathbb Z}\)-modules.
The natural transformation \(\lambda \) induces an action on hom-sets: for \(f: X \to Y\), define \(\lambda \cdot f = \lambda _Y \circ \Sigma ^{0,-1}(f)\). By naturality of \(\lambda \), this agrees with \(f \circ \lambda _X\) (up to the identification \(\Sigma ^{0,-1}X \to X\)), and is compatible with composition.
The polynomial ring \({\mathbb Z}[\lambda ]\) is the free \({\mathbb Z}\)-algebra on one generator. By its universal property, the \({\mathbb Z}\)-linear action of \(\lambda \) on each \(\mathrm{Hom}(X,Y)\) extends uniquely to a \({\mathbb Z}[\lambda ]\)-module structure.
Synthetic Spheres
The synthetic sphere \(S^{0,0}\) is defined as the monoidal unit \(\mathbf{1}\) of \(h\mathrm{Syn}\). The bigraded spheres are
For any synthetic spectrum \(X\),
By Axiom 0.103 and the unit isomorphism \(\mathbf{1} \otimes X \cong X\): \(\Sigma ^{m,n}X \cong \Sigma ^{m,n}(\mathbf{1} \otimes X) \cong \Sigma ^{m,n}\mathbf{1} \otimes X = S^{m,n} \otimes X\).
The synthetic homotopy groups of a synthetic spectrum \(X\) are
These form a bigraded abelian group with a natural \(\mathbb {Z}[\lambda ]\)-module structure (Proposition 0.106).
By the composition axiom \(\Sigma ^{m,n}\Sigma ^{k,l} \cong \Sigma ^{m+k,n+l}\), the functor \(\Sigma ^{k,l}\) is an autoequivalence and induces a bijection \([S^{m,n}, X] \cong [\Sigma ^{k,l}S^{m,n}, \Sigma ^{k,l}X] \cong [S^{m+k,n+l}, \Sigma ^{k,l}X]\).
The \(\lambda \)-action on synthetic homotopy groups is the map
defined as follows: given \(f: S^{m,n} \to X\), the element \(\lambda \cdot f \in \pi _{m,n-1}(X)\) is the composite
where the first arrow is the biShift composition isomorphism \(S^{m,n-1} = \Sigma ^{m,n-1}\mathbf{1} \cong \Sigma ^{0,-1}\Sigma ^{m,n}\mathbf{1} = \Sigma ^{0,-1}S^{m,n}\), and \(\lambda _{S^{m,n}}: \Sigma ^{0,-1}S^{m,n} \to S^{m,n}\) is the component of \(\lambda \) at \(S^{m,n}\).
Synthetic Adams Spectral Sequence
The synthetic Adams spectral sequence is a functor from \(h\mathrm{Syn}\) to the category of 3-graded spectral sequences. For a synthetic spectrum \(X \in h\mathrm{Syn}\), it produces a spectral sequence \(\prescript {\mathrm{syn}\! }{}{E}_r^{s,t,w}(X)\) with differentials
For a finite spectrum \(X \in \mathcal{S}^{\mathrm{fin}}\), the synthetic Adams spectral sequence for \(\nu X\) converges to \(\pi _{*,*}(\nu X)\).
The synthetic Adams spectral sequence is a \(\mathbb {Z}[\lambda ]\)-module spectral sequence, with \(\lambda \) in tridegree \((0,0,-1)\).
The \(\nu \) Functor
There exists an additive functor
from the homotopy category of spectra to the homotopy category of synthetic spectra.
The functor \(\nu \) intertwines suspension with bigraded suspension:
The natural comparison map \(\Sigma (\nu X) \to \nu (\Sigma X)\) is induced by \(\lambda \).
For all \(n \in {\mathbb Z}\) and spectra \(X\),
By induction on \(n\). The base case \(n = 1\) is Axiom 0.115. The inductive step follows from the biShift composition isomorphism \(\Sigma ^{n,n}\Sigma ^{1,1} \cong \Sigma ^{n+1,n+1}\).
Suppose \(X \xrightarrow {f} Y \xrightarrow {g} Z\) is a cofiber sequence of spectra such that
is a short exact sequence of \(\mathrm{H}{\mathbb F}_2\)-homology. Then \(\nu X \xrightarrow {\nu f} \nu Y \xrightarrow {\nu g} \nu Z\) is a distinguished triangle in \(h\mathrm{Syn}\).
The cohomological variant also holds: if \(X \to Y \to Z\) is a cofiber sequence with
short exact in mod 2 cohomology, then \(\nu \) sends it to a distinguished triangle. This follows from Axiom 0.117 and the universal coefficient theorem (Axiom 0.79).
Synthetic Rigidity
Let \(X \in \mathcal{S}^{\mathrm{fin}}\) be a finite spectrum. The synthetic Adams spectral sequence for \(\nu X\) has \(E_2\)-page
where an element in \(E_2^{s,t}(X)\) has tridegree \((s,t,t)\) and \(\lambda \) has tridegree \((0,0,-1)\). Given a classical Adams differential \(d_r^{\mathrm{cl}}(x) = y\), the corresponding synthetic differential is \(d_r(x) = \lambda ^{r-1}y\), which is \(\lambda \)-linear, and all synthetic Adams differentials arise in this way.
Let \(X \in \mathcal{S}^{\mathrm{fin}}\) be a finite spectrum. The synthetic Adams spectral sequence for \(\nu X\) is isomorphic to the \(\lambda \)-Bockstein spectral sequence:
\(E_2^{s,t}(X) \cong \pi _{t-s,t}(\nu X / \lambda )\).
If there is a classical Adams differential \(d_r x = y\) for \(x \in E_2^{s,t}(X) \cong \pi _{t-s,t}(\nu X / \lambda )\), then \(x\) admits a lift to \(\pi _{t-s,t}(\nu X / \lambda ^{r-1})\) whose image under the Bockstein \(\nu X / \lambda ^{r-1} \to \Sigma ^{1,-r+1} \nu X / \lambda \) equals \(d_r(x)\).
Let \(X \in \mathcal{S}^{\mathrm{fin}}\) be a finite spectrum. The \(E_\infty \)-page of the synthetic Adams spectral sequence for \(\nu X\) is
Follows from the rigidity degeneration axiom by unwinding the associated graded structure.
Let \(X \in \mathcal{S}^{\mathrm{fin}}\) be a finite spectrum. For \(r \ge 2\), the \(E_\infty \)-page of the synthetic Adams spectral sequence for \(\nu X / \lambda ^r\) is
Synthetic Lift
Let \(X, Y \in \mathcal{S}^{\mathrm{fin}}\) be finite spectra. If a map \(f: X \to Y\) has Adams filtration \(\mathrm{AF}(f) = k\), then there exists a factorization
with a dashed lift \(\Sigma ^{0,-k}\tilde{f}: \nu X \dashrightarrow \Sigma ^{0,-k}\nu Y\) such that \(\lambda ^k \circ \Sigma ^{0,-k}\tilde{f} = \nu f\), where \(\tilde{f}: \Sigma ^{0,k}\nu X \to \nu Y\) is called a synthetic lift of \(f\).
Let \(X, Y \in \mathcal{S}^{\mathrm{fin}}\) be finite spectra and let \(f: X \to Y\) be a map that induces the zero map on \(\mathrm{H}{\mathbb F}_2\)-homology: \(H_*(f; {\mathbb F}_2) = 0\). Let
be a functorial distinguished triangle (so \(W = \Sigma ^{-1}C(f)\) is the desuspended cofiber). By the \(\nu \)-functor applied to this triangle, there exists a distinguished triangle of synthetic spectra
where \(g\) denotes the boundary map. Then:
i.e., the boundary map \(g\) composed with \(\lambda \) equals the synthetic image of \(f\).
Let \(X, Y, Z \in \mathcal{S}^{\mathrm{fin}}\) be finite spectra. Suppose that \(X \xrightarrow {f} Y \xrightarrow {g} Z \xrightarrow {h} \Sigma X\) is a distinguished triangle of spectra with \(\mathrm{AF}(h) {\gt} 0\), and consequently a short exact sequence on \(\mathrm{H}{\mathbb F}_2\)-homology
Then there exists a distinguished triangle of synthetic spectra
such that \(\nu h = \lambda \hat{h}\). The last relation \(\nu h = \lambda \hat{h}\) follows from Axiom 0.124.
For a map \(f: X \to Y\) which is part of a distinguished triangle \(X \xrightarrow {f} Y \xrightarrow {g} Cf \to \Sigma X\), define
When \(\mathrm{AF}(f) = 0\), we also denote \(\nu f\) by \(\hat{f}\). In both cases, we have \(\hat{f}: \Sigma ^{0,e(f)}\nu X \to \nu Y\) and \(\nu f = \lambda ^{e(f)}\hat{f}\). Furthermore, \(C\hat{f} \simeq \Sigma ^{0,-e(g)}\nu Cf\) (by Axiom 0.124).
Let \(X, Y, Z \in \mathcal{S}^{\mathrm{fin}}\) be finite spectra. Suppose that \(X \xrightarrow {f} Y \xrightarrow {g} Z \xrightarrow {h} \Sigma X\) is a distinguished triangle with \(e(f) + e(g) + e(h) = 1\). Then there is a distinguished triangle of synthetic spectra
The construction uses Axiom 0.124 to establish the \(\lambda \)-relations between the classical and synthetic connecting maps.